Monday, September 4, 2017

2019 Mercedes-Benz A-class


 What It Is: The new Mercedes subcompact sedan, built on a new front-wheel-drive architecture dubbed MFA2.

Why It Matters: The A-class sedan is part of a wide-ranging family of small front-wheel-drive-based offerings. With this second-generation architecture, Mercedes is expanding its small-car portfolio to as many as eight models: the A-class sedan and hatch, a long-wheelbase sedan, the B-class high-roof hatch, the CLA four-door coupe and wagon (shooting brake), the GLA-class crossover, and a new GLB-class SUV.

Currently, the United States gets the CLA and the GLA, but for round two, the more conventionally shaped A-class sedan becomes the lead product while the CLA moves upmarket and takes on more of a performance bent.

Platform: MFA2 is a transverse-engine, front-drive architecture with all-wheel drive also available. The styling of the new-generation cars was previewed by the concept A four-door and is cleaner and more restrained than the busy look of today’s models. The cars still will present a sporty face to the world, however, with a grille treatment that borrows from the brand’s sports cars.

 Compared with the current CLA, the new A-class sedan has a more upright greenhouse. It should make for a much roomier interior than the cramped CLA has to offer. The cabin design and finishes are said to be much upgraded as well—taking a page from the C-class—to compete more effectively against the Audi A3 sedan.

Powertrain: Expect an evolution of the current Mercedes four-cylinder engines, with the dual-clutch automatic also returning for a second tour of duty. An entry-level AMG variant is likely, although the max-performance AMG version might be reserved for the new CLA.

 Competition:Acura ILX, Audi A3, BMW 2-series.

Estimated Arrival and Price: The new A-class should make its appearance next year before going on sale as a 2019 model. We wouldn’t expect pricing to drift too far from today’s low-$30s entry point, which is the key to pulling new prospects into the showroom—even if, once shoppers get there, they find transaction prices are much higher.
 

2018 Toyota Tundra


 Although it’s overshadowed by glorified American pickups, the Tundra butters its bread with the Toyota nameplate and off-road dexterity. Unlike U.S. rivals, the Tundra is a V-8-only lineup; there’s a standard 4.6-liter V-8 and an optional 5.7-liter that uncorks 401 lb-ft of torque. Both pair with a six-speed automatic and rear- or four-wheel drive. Packing in people is easy with a cavernous crew-cab interior; too bad it disappoints with lackluster quality and a dated design. Likewise, the Tundra’s bulbous body stands out, but its look has grown long in the tooth. Toyota has kept its aging pickup relevant via steady updates, such as this year’s additions of standard active safety features. Still, the Tundra remains a modest pickup-truck option until its much-needed major makeover.
Highs
Well-equipped lineup, cavernous crew cab, and capable off-road packages.
Lows
Dismal fuel economy, aging powertrains and styling.
Verdict
A tired but trusty work horse in a stable of stallions.
What’s New for 2018?

Far short of a significant refresh, the 2018 Tundra receives minor front-end updates and standard active safety equipment. The regular cab and the TRD Pro model are no longer available; the latter is replaced by the all-new TRD Sport. Depending on trim, there’s a new billet-style grille or a honeycomb version. Every Tundra has updated exterior lighting, with certain models getting the LED treatment. The interior has a revised gauge cluster with a larger 4.2-inch driver display. The most compelling addition is Toyota Safety Sense. This suite of advanced safety assists includes forward-collision warning, automated emergency braking, lane-departure warning, automatic high-beams, and adaptive cruise control. These additions position the Tundra alongside its dated domestic rival, the Ram 1500.
What Was New for 2017?

The Tundra received a minor redesign in 2014 and dropped its V-6 engine in 2015. Changes were minimal for 2017 models, with a tow-hitch receiver that became standard on the Tundra. The Limited model added standard power-adjustable front seats; an optional power sunroof was offered only with the crew cab. SR models added Barcelona Red Metallic, Super White, or black paint colors. Six more color options were added to the SR5 and the Limited. The TRD Pro lost most exterior colors but added red trim to the palette.
Trims and Options We’d Choose

The SR5 is the most popular model and the entry point for our Tundra of choice. It starts at $34,125. We’d choose the CrewMax cab for its spacious rear seat, but be aware it’s only available with a 5.5-foot bed that’s too short for hard-core commercial use. Those interested in towing more than 6800 pounds will want the larger 5.7-liter V-8, which has a minimum towing capacity of 8800 pounds. That engine and four-wheel drive bump costs to $40,865. While we were content with that setup in 2017, we realized the Tundra’s true value is found with off-road equipment. For this we like the second-level TRD Off-Road package ($2740) as well as the SR5 Upgrade package ($1220), which together include:

• Front bucket seats with a power-adjustable driver’s seat
• 18-inch TRD wheels with all-terrain tires
• LED headlights and fog lights
• Trail-tuned Bilstein shocks

Our 2018 Toyota Tundra SR5 CrewMax with the TRD Off-Road and SR5 Upgrade packages rings in at $44,825. That’s more expensive that the 2017 Tundra we recommended, but also several thousand less than some similarly equipped rivals.
 

2018 BMW 2-series


 If BMW’s floaty 7-series and disconnected 3-series are symptoms of something amiss in the state of Bavaria, then the 2-series is the antidote. This sports coupe is quick, nimble, and engaging the way that some our favorite Bimmers of yore were. Two models, the 248-hp 230i and the 335-hp M240i, span the distance from slightly sportier than average to nearly track ready. Both powertrains are available with all-wheel drive and as convertibles, and while the interior is cramped for four, it could be the perfect chariot for a single person in search of a more exciting commute. Others in the class have more in the way of active safety technology, luxury materials, and connectivity options, but we’re still happy any time we can get behind the wheel of this gift to BMW’s faithful.
Highs
A pair of truly great engines, big fun to drive, looks every bit a BMW.
Lows
Cramped back seat, behind the curve on active safety, interior is plain for the price.
Verdict
Small and relatively affordable (for a BMW) and a good way for Bimmerphiles to get their fix.
What’s New for 2018?

After a thorough overhaul in the form of two new engines in 2017, changes to the 2-series are minor this year. The interior design has been tweaked, with new high-gloss black trim on the center stack and touches of chrome brightwork on some switches. Three new metallic colors are available, and there are four new wheel designs, including new standard wheels for both the 230i and the M240i. LED head- and taillamps are now standard, too.
What Was New for 2017?

Both of the available engines for the 2-series were new for 2017, resulting in new names for both models. The entry-level trim, formerly the 228i, became the 230i with a 248-hp turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four. The scalding M240i, previously known as the M235i, received a new 335-hp turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six. Seventeen-inch wheels became standard equipment on the 230i, while 18-inch wheels and sticky Michelin Pilot Super Sport summer tires made their way onto the M240i. The Technology package was updated to include navigation, and a wireless charging pad and a Wi-Fi hotspot, among other minor infotainment updates, were also made available.
Trims and Options We’d Choose

The 2-series presents us with the agony of choice. Both models are good in their own right: the 230i is the lower-key, more well-rounded sibling. It’s well executed and less costly, at a starting price of $35,795, and swift enough to keep most drivers happy. The M240i is the hot rod of the family, always ready for action, with eye-popping acceleration just a push of the throttle away, but it starts at $46,295. A sweet-shifting manual transmission is a no-cost option for both trim levels, and all-wheel drive can replace rear-wheel drive for $2000 in either model. Making the 230i a convertible adds $5800, while a droptop M240i is $4600 more than its fixed-roof twin. We’ll go big with the M240i coupe, which comes standard with:

• Adaptive suspension
• 10-way power-adjustable front seats
• Adaptive cruise control
 

2018 Volvo XC60 T8 Plug-In Hybrid

Volvo is not known to brag about horsepower. Not that Volvo has anything against horsepower—it wouldn’t have the Polestar performance brand if it did—it’s just that horsepower isn’t an area in which the Swedish firm tends to have much to brag about. Yet chief among the points Volvo has made time and again since introducing its all-new 2018 XC60 crossover is the impressive 400 horsepower produced by the XC60 T8’s complex plug-in-hybrid powertrain, the same setup found in the larger, seven-seat XC90 T8. That’s more horsepower than almost every crossover in its class, tying the standard Porsche Macan Turbo. Furthermore, its 472 lb-ft of torque exceeds that of the Macan Turbo with the Performance package by 30 lb-ft. Volvo won’t get to brag for long, with the upcoming 469-hp Mercedes-AMG GLC63 and 505-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio poised to raise the bar in the not-too-distant future. But until those monsters arrive, Volvo can ride its high-horsepower high horse right into the 400-horsepower club, where Swedes have rarely been seen until now.



Highs
Brisk acceleration, Zen-like cabin, interior finery.
Lows
Turbo lag, uneven powertrain response, not-so-sporty engine note.
Macan Turbo, You’re Safe

We came away from our first drive in a 316-hp XC60 T6 quite impressed, and so we were curious to see how Volvo would put the T8 powertrain’s additional 84 electric ponies to use in the smaller of its two SPA-based crossovers. Would the added power turn the XC60 into a fearsome sporting machine that could give the Macan Turbo some competition? Or would the XC60 T8 parrot the stoicism of the XC90 T8? For us, the answer would be found 1000 miles away and one mile above sea level in Denver, Colorado, where we drove the XC60 T8.

Once we got to the Mile High City, we didn’t need to travel even a full mile forward before determining that the Macan Turbo’s position is safe. From the moment we sat inside and scanned the finery of our Inscription-grade test example, we knew immediately that performance was no more a priority for this rig than in its less powerful siblings. Indeed, all XC60 T8 trim levels—Momentum, R-Design, and Inscription—have more or less the same standard and optional equipment as their T6 counterparts. The only visual cue that one has plopped into the driver’s seat of a T8 is the presence of a gleaming, Orrefors crystal gear selector—a gorgeous bit of sculpture, to be sure, but not the sort of item that says, “Welcome to the 400-horsepower club.”

 Likewise, Volvo did little to sharpen the T8’s other performance attributes. The T8’s all-wheel-drive system differs from that found in XC60 T5 and T6 models in its use of an 87-hp AC motor to turn its rear wheels rather than a driveshaft. Up front, a 46-hp electric motor is sandwiched between the 313-hp, supercharged-and-turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four and the eight-speed automatic transaxle. The T8’s 10.4-kWh lithium-ion battery pack is housed in the center tunnel where the driveshaft otherwise would be. Aside from an enlarged front center armrest and the omission of center air vents for rear-seat passengers, the fitment of the T8’s electrical components has little impact on the XC60’s cabin.
Quick But . . .

The electrical components do have an impact on acceleration, however. Mash the go pedal on a freeway on-ramp and the XC60 T8 will press you back into the company’s signature ergonomic seats more forcefully than any Volvo SUV in history. We estimate the T8 will tip the scales at 4800 pounds and that it can accelerate to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds. Even though the T8 outweighs the T6 by more than 500 pounds, it should still get to 60 mph about 0.7 second ahead of the T6. The Macan Turbo, for reference, shot from zero to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds in our last test.

 The best way to hustle the XC60 T8 onto the highway is with the driving mode set to Power, which increases the T8’s general alertness, keeping both the gasoline engine and electric motors engaged, quickening the steering, firming up the damping, and lowering the suspension (when equipped with optional air springs). The system defaults to a neutral Hybrid mode, but a knurled thumbwheel grants drivers access to Power mode, an AWD mode to ensure the rear axle’s additional thrust, an Off Road mode that locks the front and rear axles at speeds of less than 25 mph, a Pure mode that maximizes electric driving, and, finally, an Individual mode that can blend the powertrain, suspension, steering, instruments, regenerative brakes, and climate-control parameters to your liking.

Even with assistance from a supercharger and two electric motors, the XC60 T8’s turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder still exhibited turbo lag in each of the settings we tried (except for the battery-driven Pure mode, of course). The engine’s flaccid note also put a damper on our experience, although a faint supercharger whine occasionally can be heard. And the interplay of all those boosting devices isn’t always seamless, with surges particularly at full throttle in Power mode. At least the regenerative brakes operate nicely, initiating with a crisp bite and no untoward jerks.
Oh, That’s Right, It’s a Luxury Car

Four-hundred horsepower is indeed an impressive figure for a compact crossover, but even with that much grunt on tap, the T8 just isn’t that fun. It is, however, an excellent luxury vehicle, especially in Inscription form. Gliding along silently on electric power, the XC60 takes the Zen-like calmness of its interior to another level. With the gas engine engaged, power is robust and engine noise is generally unobtrusive. The auto stop/start function generally goes unnoticed. We would have liked paddle shifters or some way to manually select ratios on the Inscription, although customers so inclined will probably choose the R-Design model, which does come with paddle shifters.

 The EPA says the XC60 T8 can travel 18 miles on electricity alone, interestingly one mile less than the heavier XC90. Volvo claims that the XC60 T8’s battery can be recharged in as little as three hours from a 240-volt source, double that for a standard 120-volt outlet.
Dollars and Sense

Prices start at $53,895 for the 2018 XC60 T8 Momentum, rising to $57,195 for the R-Design model, which gets dark exterior trim, aluminum-mesh accents inside, 19-inch wheels, sport seats, navigation, and more. A few bucks more buys the $57,695 Inscription model, replete with a leather-covered dashboard, real driftwood inlays, navigation, and 20-inch wheels. Each T8 price represents an $8000 upcharge over the corresponding T6 version, although many buyers could reclaim up to $5002 of that from the feds at tax time, with various state incentives potentially bringing costs down even lower. So long as the federal incentives remain in place, the T8 could represent a rather compelling deal, and we’re not alone in thinking so. Volvo says that about 15 percent of the orders taken so far for the XC60 are for the T8, a much higher take rate than for the XC90 T8.

 Should customers apply that rebate money toward options, the $1100 Vision package is a good place to start, adding blind-spot and cross-traffic alerts, automatic mirror dimming, power-retractable outside mirrors, and a parking-assist function. The Inscription’s $3000 Luxury Seat package adds massaging, ventilated front seats swathed in nappa leather and equipped with power side bolsters and cushion extenders. The $1800 air springs allowed a bit too much body motion for our tastes, even in Power mode, but the payoff was an extracreamy ride and a hushed cabin, the latter helping make the 1100-watt, 15-speaker Bowers & Wilkins sound system seem almost worth the $3200 investment. Other extras include a Convenience package for $2000 or $2200, depending on trim level; it includes adaptive cruise control with semi-autonomous Pilot Assist. An Advanced package full of tech goodies costs $1900, and there are many more stand-alone items, including R-Design models and 21-inch wheels with summer tires.

For what it’s worth, an XC60 T8 R-Design with those 21s and summer rubber could be the closest thing to a Porsche Macan competitor that Volvo will offer. But that is not this model’s intention—although 400 horsepower definitely is a fun talking point.

2018 Jeep Wrangler JK

 Overview: The current Jeep Wrangler lives to see another model year, and it is officially dubbed the Wrangler JK for 2018. It will be sold alongside the all-new, JL-generation 2018 Wrangler that will debut this fall and go on sale shortly thereafter. Whereas the JL Wrangler likely will be available with three different engine options, including a turbocharged inline-four and a diesel-drinking turbocharged V-6, the Wrangler JK will continue to be powered solely by Fiat Chrysler’s familiar 285-hp 3.6-liter V-6. Fortunately, the engine once again can be mated to a six-speed manual transmission, with a five-speed automatic remaining optional.




Two four-wheel-drive systems are offered on the Wrangler JK. The Command-Trac part-time system is standard on the Sport, Sport S, and Sahara trim levels, as well as special-edition variants based off those models. The system includes a 2.72:1 low range for crawling over tough terrain. Those in search of even more capability will want to step up to the Rock-Trac part-time system that’s featured on the Wrangler JK Rubicon. It includes front and rear anti-roll bars that can be disconnected at the push of a button as well as locking front and rear differentials; the Rock-Trac four-wheel-drive system also comes with an even shorter 4.0:1 low range.

 As in previous years, the Wrangler JK is offered in two- and four-door body styles. Four-door models are christened Unlimited and bear a starting price that’s $3900 greater than that of their two-door counterpart. Opting for the Unlimited adds more than 20 inches to the Wrangler JK’s wheelbase, 1.6 inches of rear legroom, and 19 cubic feet of cargo volume.

What’s New: A new Wrangler JK decal on the driver’s-side fender is the most prominent visual cue for the 2018 models. Other changes include a new Golden Eagle edition and the revival of the Altitude edition. The Golden Eagle features special decals on the hood; steel bumpers; bronze-colored headlight rings, grille surrounds, badges, tow hooks, and wheels; titanium-colored interior trim; bronze accent stitching; and Golden Eagle logos on the headrests. Also included is a tan softtop, which can be had on Wrangler JK Freedom and Rubicon Recon editions as well. Meanwhile, the Altitude features blacked-out headlight rings, front and rear bumper trim, and grille surrounds; a power-bulge hood; titanium interior trim; and black leather seats with gray stitching. Finally, both the Willys Wheeler and Freedom editions can be optioned with a rear differential that can be mechanically locked with the push of a button.

The new JL Wrangler, about which you can read more here, will add the aforementioned powertrain options, an available power top, and a pickup body style called the Scrambler.

 What We Like: There are few vehicles more capable off-road than the Wrangler JK. Equipped with removable doors, a removable roof, and a fold-down windshield, the four-wheel-drive Wrangler JK is one of the most fun and proficient ways to explore off the beaten path or to feel the wind in your hair. It’s also hard not to fall for the Wrangler JK’s charming and simple design, which can trace its roots back to the Willys MB Jeep of World War II fame.

What We Don’t Like: The Wrangler JK’s off-road capability comes at the cost of its on-road manners. Live front and rear axles do the Wrangler JK’s ride quality no favors. The body also rolls precariously in turns, and the stability-control system regularly cuts in to prevent the droptop SUV from actually rolling over. Wind noise is exceptionally loud at highway speeds, and this Jeep drinks gas like it’s at an open bar. The available touchscreen infotainment system also is slow to respond to inputs and suffers from poor ergonomics.

Verdict: At home off-road, barely tolerable on tarmac, and undeniably cool.

2018 Mazda CX-3



One spirited drive behind the wheel of the CX-3 will have even the keenest driving enthusiasts singing its praises. We’ve come to expect playful driving dynamics, eager powertrains, and driver-focused interiors from Mazda—it’s the zoom-zoom brand, after all—and this subcompact crossover doesn’t disappoint. Once its practicality is under the microscope, however, the CX-3’s shine starts to fade. It’s small. Shoppers who prioritize cargo space and room for passengers would be better served by many of the CX-3’s rivals, or even a Mazda 3 hatchback. Even so, the CX-3 is on our short list of great crossovers, even if it’s solely for its corner-carving expertise and its fun-loving character.
What’s New for 2018?

Besides a slight price increase, Mazda made low-speed automated emergency braking standard across the CX-3 lineup. It also introduced the company’s G-Vectoring Control system, which reduces engine torque imperceptibly as the CX-3 enters a corner to help improve cornering stability. This new system is accompanied by a tweaked suspension. To reduce cabin noise, Mazda added thicker window glass, extra sound-deadening materials, and revised door seals. The mid-level Touring model now comes standard with automatic headlamps, rain-sensing windshield wipers, and automatic climate control. The top-spec Grand Touring model benefits from an improved full-color head-up display. The Grand Touring’s i-Activsense safety package from 2017 has been renamed the Premium package; it retains the active safety features—high-speed automated emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-departure warning, and automatic high-beam headlamps—but gains a power-adjustable driver’s seat with lumbar support and memory settings, a heated steering wheel, and traffic-sign recognition.
What Was New for 2017?

Not much. Mazda’s littlest crossover cruised into its second model year with two changes. Mid-level Touring models were made standard with the same 18-inch wheels as the top-spec Grand Touring. More notable was that the Grand Touring model’s i-Activsense package—Mazda’s clever name for active safety technology—dropped in price by $750 and now costs $1170.
Trims and Options We’d Choose

For 2017 we chose the mid-level Touring trim, and we’d stick with that same trim for 2018. Its starting price is $23,135 ($235 more than the 2017), and it’s the best blend of value, style, and comfort. It adds a number of items to the CX-3’s feature list. Among those, the most noteworthy include:

• 18-inch wheels
• Rain-sensing windshield wipers
• Heated front seats
• Blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert

The Premium package is re-dubbed the Touring Preferred Equipment package for 2018 but still adds a power sunroof, Bose seven-speaker audio, SiriusXM satellite radio, a rear cargo cover, and $1410 to the bottom line. Front-wheel drive is standard, but, if you need it, all-wheel drive is available on any CX-3 for a reasonable $1250.

2018 Jaguar F-type 2.0T





 First they came for the compacts, and we didn’t speak out because we didn’t much care. Then they came for the regular sedans, and the promise of turbocharging bought both our silence and tacit assent. But now the insidious forces of downsizing have come for our sports cars, and there’s nobody left to hear our pain.

Highs
Strong torque response, less mass and lower price than previous F-types.
Lows
No manual gearbox offered, sounds like a four-cylinder, price still higher than Porsche 718s.

Porsche’s decision to move the 718 generation of the Boxster and Cayman from a zinging flat-six to a turbocharged flat-four could be justified by the brand’s long association with smaller engines, from the four-cylinder 356 onward. But Jaguar has no such historical excuses for the shrink ray it has applied to the F-type’s powerplant, with the new 2.0-liter base model marking the first time this British brand has produced a sports car with fewer than six cylinders.

 The powerplant in question is Jaguar Land Rover’s newly developed Ingenium turbocharged gasoline inline-four engine, set to be rolled out throughout most of the Jaguar and Land Rover range in short order and delivering an impressive amount of firepower in the F-type. It might be short on both cylinders and displacement when compared with its predecessors, but the peak 296 horsepower is slightly more than the Jaguar XJ-S made from a 5.3-liter V-12 in the early 1990s.

Jaguar is predictably keen to have us perceive the new powerplant as something other than an economy option, and—although the four-cylinder will drop the entry-level price for the range slightly—the most obvious benefit is the claimed paring of 115 pounds of mass when compared with the 3.0-liter V-6 that now sits above it in the range hierarchy. The 2.0-liter will be available only with an eight-speed automatic gearbox; Jaguar execs admit that their expensively engineered six-speed manual transmission offered in V-6 F-type models is selling in disappointingly small numbers. There won’t be an all-wheel-drive option with the smaller engine, either. Jaguar asserts that the 2.0-liter automatic will dispatch the zero-to-60-mph benchmark in 5.4 seconds, or 0.1 second quicker than the company’s claim for the previous base model, a 340-hp V-6 with the manual. The only stick-shift F-type we’ve tested was a coupe equipped with the stronger 380-hp V-6, which appends an S to the name and ran to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds.

Visually, the four-cylinder model is distinguished from other F-types by being limited to a single central exhaust pipe in the middle of the rear bumper. LED headlights and Jaguar’s InControl Touch Pro infotainment system are now standard, adding some extra value beyond that given by the four-cylinder’s slightly reduced price. (The coupe is $60,895 compared with last year’s base of $62,395 for a manual V-6; the convertible costs $63,995 to last year’s $66,395.)

Lacks Little on the Road

We drove the new car over some of the same roads in North Wales that Jaguar’s engineering team made extensive use of during its development. This is a land where the asphalt can be as challenging as the syntax—the fast A470 that links Betwys-y-Coed with Blaenau Ffestiniog is particularly notable on both counts—and this smaller-engined F-type acquits itself brilliantly.

The new engine isn’t the most natural sports car powerplant, being more keen to produce low-down grunt than high-revving excitement. With the gearbox in manual mode and the car in its more aggressive Dynamic setting (accessed through a checkered-flag switch next to the gear selector), it is not hard to find the engine’s rev limiter—at 6750 rpm in first and second gears and 6500 rpm in higher ratios. Left to its own devices, though, the transmission always shifts far closer to 5500 rpm where the engine’s output peaks, but these gearchanges are both prompt and smooth.

While there’s no shortage of noise under enthusiastic use thanks to a rorty exhaust system—and even some pops and bangs when the driver lifts off the accelerator—there’s never any doubt that you’re listening to a four-cylinder soundtrack, which sounds, frankly, incongruous in a two-seat Jaguar. It’s the one area where the basic F-type feels clearly inferior to its six- and eight-cylinder siblings, although under gentle use the engine note fades away to a pleasing background burble.

 There are some clear benefits, too. The mass reduction over the nose helps the 2.0-liter car feel markedly more agile than its heftier sisters when asked to turn-in to slower corners, yet this Jag stays just as planted as any F-type in faster turns. Ultimate adhesion will no doubt measure lower on our skidpad, thanks to narrower tires and fractionally softer springs, but the four-cylinder car feels more exploitable. The engine helps in this, too. Both the V-6 and the V-8 cars frequently struggle for traction, and even the AWD versions can feel wayward when asked to find grip on a slippery surface. Yet the 2.0-liter’s lower output and gentler power delivery mean it never feels tail-happy, even when a typical Welsh rainstorm rolls through to slicken the road surface.

This new base F-type might lack raw power compared with the previous one, but it can be driven at a far higher percentage of its potential more often. As a result, it lacks little over its more expensive siblings in terms of real-world pace—or even thrills.

Unlikely to Dominate U.S. Sales

Apart from its bland soundtrack, the 2.0-liter F-type seems like a convincing expansion of the model range. Yet we know its appeal has been honed for those parts of the world where gasoline costs more than vintage wine and where buyers pay punitive taxes based on displacement, power output, or CO2 emissions. None of that applies in these United States, so we suspect that most U.S. buyers will continue to opt for the brawnier and better-sounding V-6 and V-8 versions, despite the savings offered by the four-cylinder.

Then there’s the small matter of the Porsche Boxster and Cayman. Even this four-banger F-type still carries a significant price premium over what are currently our two favorite sports cars, while the Ingenium makes no more power than the base 718s. Americans willing to pay more for the Jaguar are likely to choose one of its more powerful engines.